Does the US Need to Set a Digital Agenda?

Former Cisco CEO John Chambers

During a speech by former Cisco CEO John Chambers at BoxWorks 2015, he lamented the fact that the US government does not have a proper technological agenda in place. According to his reasoning this is a necessary step to ensure future prosperity and growth. This is despite evidence to the contrary that markets do, in fact, adapt and make good use of rapidly changing technology on their own.

There are steps the government can take to enable technological progress, but such potential steps are always to roll back layers of government intervention that are already in place. Suggesting … Continue reading

David Hume’s View on the Size and Scale of Government

Portrait of David Hume

This evening I received a link from a user on twitter ( @jpayneancap ) to an article by Donald W. Livingston over at The Imaginative Conservative discussing the ideal size and scale of the state. LibertyExplored takes no official position on whether there should be a state, as we realize the significant contribution that both anarchists and minarchists have made to the libertarian tradition. Our view is that any government that exists should be decentralized in nature and small in size.

In this article, Livingston lays out the approach David Hume takes to the issue of the … Continue reading

Review of “Real Dissent” by Thomas E. Woods Jr.

Real Dissent by Tom Woods

Tom Woods’ book Real Dissent draws a sharp distinction between authentic and insignificant political discourse. His central thesis in the book is that the opinion-molders in the media have narrowly defined the “legitimate” debate in this country to being between the positions held by the popular Republican and Democratic candidates. Those who suggest radical change or question fundamentals in the functioning of the system are mocked and ridiculed for being outside the acceptable range of opinion. These are those that dare say something that’s not on the 3×5 card of allowable opinion, the metaphor Woods uses to describe the perceived … Continue reading

Government Will Use Crises to Expand Power

Over the past month, there has been rising fear over terrorism by ISIS and there is now a real threat of Ebola spreading within the US. Fears and rumors are running rampant among the citizens of this country. This morning, I was greeted with the news that a second health care worked has been infected with Ebola in my home state. History shows us that in a time of increased fear, governments love to capitalize and expand their power, and the citizens are often all too willing to justify these actions over fears of their safety. Their memories become short and they literally can’t remember the history of government expansion and its consequences. This is a trap we as Americans can not afford to continue to fall into.

Our president has expanded the war on terror over the past month. A new shadowy terror group called Khorasan has emerged in the past couple of weeks seemingly out of nowhere. This group was immediately said to consist of Al-Qaeda members and officials in the administration claimed the group as an imminent threat to the US. As it turned out, there was no specific intelligence gathered of targets or a terror plot that was imminent, but this hardly mattered to government officials. FBI Director James Comey recently stated the following: “I can’t sit here and tell you whether their plan is tomorrow or three weeks or three months from now”, but that “we have to act as if it’s coming tomorrow.”1 Right, there is a vague threat to the US from this group at some point in the future (which, by definition, is not imminent) so we have to bomb now. Haven’t we heard this story before? The facts don’t matter to this administration nor did they matter to his predecessor Bush. Obama has his “justification” for bombing in Syria and the expansion of the war on terror.

Watch the following video by the Young Turks on Khorasan and the manipulation of the media. This is a textbook case of government inventing a vague enemy and using the media to promote war to the public. [WARNING: VIDEO CONTAINS LANGUAGE]

The government will capitalize on the fear of citizens in order to expand its power. They did this with the Patriot Act legislation after the 9/11 attacks which was passed before most had the chance to understand its consequences on their liberties.

We should be cautious about any new legislation that is proposed in Congress in order to combat terrorism or the Ebola threat.

1. Russia Today. Khorasan terrorists will attack US ‘very, very soon,’ FBI director warns.
Share this:Share on Google+Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on RedditShare on TumblrPrint this page

School Board Decision to Promote Patriotism over Fact

History has a pattern of being written with a slant in favor of the nation in which it originates. The new curriculum being proposed by a school board in Jefferson county, Colorado takes this a step further and goes out of its way to promote patriotism, and a positive view of the US government in the teaching of US history to AP students. This comes at the expense of censoring the negative (and sometimes illegal) actions taken by government in the past.

This is a video of student protests in Jefferson county from CBS news:

There should be a theory behind the teaching of history and there will be some inevitable bias introduced. But this is an intentional attempt to promote pro-state dogma as fact and influence students to being more statist and nationalistic in their view of history.

Patriotism and loyalty to one’s home land can be well founded, but it should not come before the loyalty one has for his own values and principles. My loyalty as a Libertarian is first placed in the principle of non-aggression. Unless done in self defense, the right to extend my fist ends at another person’s nose. When you are giving your loyalty to a government that continues a relentless military intervention campaign in the middle east and spends without end here at home, you are implicitly backing such government actions.

Patriotism has a limited role in the teaching of history and should not be prioritized over factual accounts.

Share this:Share on Google+Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on RedditShare on TumblrPrint this page

Tesla Motors Opens its Patents

Tesla Factory

Tesla Factory
Image by Steve Jurvetson, Original source.

Company founder and CEO Elon Musk announced this month that he has decided to open Tesla Motors’ patents to other competitors. Musk was interviewed by Business Week magazine and stated that “You want to be innovating so fast that you invalidate your prior patents, in terms of what really matters. It’s the velocity of innovation that matters.”

Electric cars have been slow to catch on with other auto manufacturers, and Musk is essentially saying that he wants increased competition in the electric car market. He cites climate change as a reason, and believes that this move will speed the transition away from conventionally powered vehicles. A reason this could be good for Musk is that the infrastructure to support electric cars such as charging stations, is not well developed nationally. Increased competition will increase market pressure to build the infrastructure necessary to expand the overall electric market which will be good for Tesla Motors in the end. Innovation is what builds a business, and Musk recognizes this. Tesla Motors has the first mover advantage in the electric car market and has accrued significant name recognition for the brand.

The voluntary move to open it’s patents is not something we commonly see in a market. Usually a company will try to fight tooth and claw to protect it’s patents and rack up huge legal costs for itself in the process. There are libertarians on both sides of the patent issue. Some claim that having patent law restricts overall innovation while others argue just the opposite. I see this as a great move in support of free markets and look forward to future innovations by Tesla and the new companies that will take advantage of the technology.

Here’s the article from Business Week:

Share this:Share on Google+Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on RedditShare on TumblrPrint this page

Incongruent Justice

There have been a number of recent cases where the punishment handed down does not fit the crime. Many of these stem from problems of the US federal government continuing in it’s failing policies of the war on drugs, and establishing so-called mandatory minimum sentences. These sentences in some cases have led to small scale drug offenses being as severely punished as violent acts.

In one example from a few days ago, a 19-year old male in Texas will be tried on first-degree felony charges for making and selling brownies containing hash oil, a concentrated form of THC extracted … Continue reading

Look to Technology for Answers to Climate Change; Not Government Regulation


The Problem of Extrapolating into the Future

It has become the general consensus among most scientists that man has played some significant role in the changing of the climate. My purpose in this article is not to tackle the scientific aspects of climate change or to dispute the role of fossil fuels produced by man. For the purpose of this argument, I will accept the proposition that man has caused at least a significant role in altering the global climate. By extrapolating current trends of CO2 emissions, one can quickly fall into the trap that the only hope for the … Continue reading